Kay doods, check it. Everyone on the Left is bashing Christine O'Donnell after her recent debate with Chris Coons and bashing her because she demanded to know where in the Constitution seperation of church and state was written, and the fact that she refuted the response that it was in the First Amendment.
You Liberals are really going to hate this, but each of you laughing in your sleeves at O'Connell's apparent stupidity are only shining in your own glaring ignorance because--drum roll--
She's right. Nowhere in the Constitution, and specifically the First Amendment, is there any mention of separation of church and state. You need proof. Kay, class is totally in session. Lesson one, let's look at the First Amendment.
"Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech; or the press; or the right of the people to peacefully assemble, and to petition the government for redress of grievances."
To translate, the first sentence means this: Congress shall not have the right to impose a single religion on the people; or prevent the people from worshiping as they please. If there is any relevance in the Left yelling the First Amendment demands separation of church and state, look at the second part of the sentence. It could very easily be said that by Liberals and the Left demanding that separation such as say like prayers in school, they are violating the First Amendment in not allowing that free exercise of religion.
Kay, so here we have the First Amendment, in black and white, clearly spelling out what it means about religion. Where exactly did O'Connell fail to show her understanding of the First Amendment? More importantly, how does the Left now spin it to hide their own shame and embarrassment at clearly knowing nothing about the Constitution?
Class dismissed.
No comments:
Post a Comment